Thuman Eugene Stanphill, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 390 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- 390 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1968)
February 14, 1968
Willys I. Peck (argued), of McNamee, Peck, Neil & Melino, Los Gatos, Cal., for appellant.
Michael L. Morehouse, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Sidney Lezak, U. S. Atty., Richard C. Helegson, Mallory C. Walker, Asst. U. S. Attys., Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
There appears to have been a rational basis in fact for the classification given Stanphill in the administrative process which denied him a ministerial exemption from the draft.
Therefore, the conviction is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
