United States of America Ex Rel. Adam Stamm, H-1137, Appellant, v. Alfred T. Rundle, Supt, 389 F.2d 1006 (3d Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseDecided March 21, 1968
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Alfred L. Luongo, Judge, 270 F. Supp. 819.
Adam Stamm, pro se.
Arthur Ed. Saylor, First Asst. Dist. Atty., County of Berks, Reading, Pa. (Robert L. VanHoove, Dist. Atty., Reading, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before HASTIE, Chief Judge and SEITZ and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by a state prisoner, serving a life term on a murder conviction, from the denial of his petition for federal habeas corpus.
The carefully reasoned opinion of the District Court, entered after an evidentiary hearing on certain controverted issues, considers and properly disposes of each significant contention of the petition.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
