United States of America v. Albert J. Marnoch, Appellant, 382 F.2d 1019 (3d Cir. 1967)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit - 382 F.2d 1019 (3d Cir. 1967) Argued September 12, 1967
Decided October 25, 1967

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Francis L. Van Dusen, Judge.

Jay Meyers, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Austin Hogan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U. S. Atty., Austin Hogan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, FREEDMAN and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.


On review of the record we are of the opinion that the evidence amply supported the verdict of guilty rendered by then District Court Judge Van Dusen to whom the case was tried without a jury, and that there is no basis for the defendant's contention that some of the evidence was obtained in violation of his privilege against self-incrimination.

The judgment of sentence will be affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.