Armand F. Roberge, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 377 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseOn Petition to Review a Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.
Armand F. Roberge, in pro. per.
Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jacksom, Gilbert E. Andrews, Robert H. Solomon, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Lester Uretz, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before BROWNING, DUNIWAY, and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We have examined the record in the light of petitioner's arguments and conclude that the judgment must be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Tax Court. T. C. Memo. 1966-1.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
