Lyndell Wilson, Appellant, v. the Ohio River Company, a Corporation, Appellee, 375 F.2d 775 (4th Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseSee also D.C., 234 F. Supp. 283; D.C., 236 F. Supp. 96.
Harry Alan Sherman, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Chad W. Ketchum, Huntington, W. Va., on brief), for appellant.
Harold R. Schmidt, Pittsburgh, Pa. (R. Gregory McNeer, Huntington, W. Va. and Anthony J. Polito, Pittsburgh, Pa., Campbell, McNeer, Woods, Bagley & Emerson, Huntington, W. Va., and Rose, Schmidt & Dixon, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, CRAVEN, Circuit Judge, and SIMONS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
In this appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, we find an adequate basis for the jury's factual determination. It was not bound to accept uncritically the plaintiff's testimonial claim.
We find no merit in the other contentions of trial error.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
