James Daniel Morgan, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 340 F.2d 125 (9th Cir. 1965)
Annotate this CaseDonald Jay Solomon, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Manuel L. Real, U. S. Atty., John K. Van de Kamp, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Sec., Phillip W. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before JERTBERG and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's sole contention on this appeal is that the heroin which was received in evidence should have been excluded on the ground that it is a product of an illegal search and seizure. We hold to the contrary. See Blackford v. U. S., 247 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1957) C.D., 356 U.S. 914, 78 S. Ct. 672, 2 L. Ed. 2d 586.
The Judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
