The National Machinery Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the Waterbury Farrel Foundry & Machine Company and Textron, Inc., Defendants-appellees, 337 F.2d 944 (2d Cir. 1964)
Annotate this CaseDecided November 4, 1964
H. F. McNenny, Cleveland, Ohio (John Hoxie, Harvey M. Brownrout and Davis, Hoxie, Faithfull & Hapgood, New York City and D. W. Farrington and Richey, McNenny & Farrington, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
Willis H. Taylor, Jr., New York City (Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We find that patents 2,542,023 and 2,542,864 are invalid for lack of invention as set forth in the opinion of Judge Blumenfeld, reported at 221 F. Supp. 77, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
