United States of America, Appellant, v. Ferguson Barnes and Esther Barnes, Appellees, 327 F.2d 986 (5th Cir. 1964)
Annotate this CaseBurton Berkley, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Donald C. Lehman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Edith House, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Robert N. Anderson, William Friedlander, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Edward F. Boardman, U. S. Atty., of counsel, for appellant.
John W. Mooers and Hugh R. Dowling, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS** and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the Government from a judgment based on a jury verdict in a taxpayer's suit for refund. The sole issue in the case is whether loans and advances made by the taxpayer to his controlled corporation, which became worthless claims in his hands on the corporation's insolvency, can be deducted as a worthless debt incurred in the taxpayer's trade or business. The undisputed facts required a directed verdict in favor of the United States. They "showed no more than a loss by an investor in a corporation resulting from a transaction entered into to bring profit to the corporation, and thereby to its stockholders", United States v. Byck, (5 Cir.) 325 F.2d 551, December 20, 1963. See Whipple v. Commissioner, 373 U.S. 193, 83 S. Ct. 1168, 10 L. Ed. 2d 288.
The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for the entry of a judgment for the United States.
Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
