Hattie Ray King and James Albert King, Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee, 327 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1964)
Annotate this CaseRehearing Denied March 3, 1964
John Gregg, Jackson, Miss., Hugh L. Bailey, Winona, Miss., for appellants.
H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration, we conclude that there is no substance in the grounds asserted for this appeal. Counsel took no exceptions to the charge of the court, thus failing to preserve any claim of error arising from the charge. We think it is plain that there is no basis for the contention here made that the trial court's comments on the evidence constituted substantial error against appellants.
The judgment is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
