Charles Weissman, Appellant, v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami et al., Appellees, 327 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1964)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Emett C. Choate, Judge.
Monroe Gelb, Daniel S. Pearson, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
Richard R. Booth, Miami, Fla., amicus curiae, for appellant.
Warren D. Hamann, Miami, Fla., Dixon, DeJarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, Fla., for appellees; H. Reid DeJarnette, Miami, Fla., of counsel.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We have carefully considered appellant's contention that the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment in favor of the appellee Banks, the defendants below. We find no justification for holding that there were any disputed issues of fact that would have warranted a recovery by the appellant on any theory of the case advanced by him.
The judgment is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
