A. H. Carpenter et al., Appellants, v. Wayne R. Glock et al., Appellees.a. H. Carpenter et al., Appellants, v. G. A. Mcdowell, Appellee.a. H. Carpenter et al., Appellants, v. Claude C. Johnson, Appellee.a. H. Carpenter et al., Appellants, v. Robert E. Johnson, Appellee.a. H. Carpenter et al., Appellants, v. H. F. Garton, Appellee.a. H. Carpenter et al., Appellants, v. Dean Williams et al., Appellees.a. H. Carpenter et al., Appellants, R. R. Calvert, Appellee.r.r. Calvert, Appellee, 286 F.2d 431 (6th Cir. 1961)
Annotate this Case,H. M. Shumate and Thomas D. Shumate, Irvine, Ky., Shumate & Shumate, Irvine, Ky., and M. A. Rowady, Winchester, Ky., on brief, for appellants.
Troy D. Savage, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, Ky., J. Marshall McCann, Lexington, Ky., on brief, for appellees.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
These consolidated cases have been heard and considered upon the extensive record and upon the briefs and oral arguments of counsel for the parties; and
It appearing that the decision of the trial judge is clearly set forth by him in his opinion-findings and conclusions; that his findings of fact in each case are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous; and that his conclusions of law are correctly drawn and based upon proper authority;
It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment of theUnited States District Court in each case be affirmed upon the comprehensive findings, conclusions and opinion of Judge Ford. 184 F. Supp. 829.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
