Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. William N. Fry, Jr., and Mable W. Fry, Respondents.commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. William Stokes Walters and Milly Fry Walters, Respondents, 283 F.2d 869 (6th Cir. 1960)
Annotate this CaseJohn J. Pajak, Washington, D. C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and I. Henry Kutz, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief, for petitioner.
Charles H. Davis, Memphis, Tenn., Montedonico, Boone, Gilliland, Heiskell & Loch, Memphis, Tenn., on brief, for respondents.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and CECIL and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decision of the Tax Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Tietjens. 31 T.C. 522.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
