Tidewater Development and Sales Corporation and Isadore Brill, Trustee, Oliver Ellsworth Rue, Trustee, Gotham Investment Corporation, Philip Smith, Harold E. Luber, Morris Reamer, and Roberta Hoffman, Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee, 279 F.2d 890 (4th Cir. 1960)
Annotate this CaseJohn Joseph Baecher and S. Beryl Adler, Norfolk, Va., for appellants.
Joseph S. Bambacus, U. S. Atty., Richmond, Va., Franklin C. Baugh, Asst. U. S. Atty., Norfolk, Va., Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, S. Billingsley Hill, and Elizabeth Dudley, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this condemnation case, the landowner and certain noteholders, to whom it is indebted, thinking the jury's verdict inadequate, complain of the District Court's refusal of a motion for new trial. In denying the motion, the District Court filed an opinion1 which sufficiently shows there was no abuse of discretion in denial of the motion. After considering certain collateral questions which have been raised, we find no reversible error.
Affirmed.
United States of America v. 9.85 Acres of Land, More or Less, in City of Hampton, Virginia, and Tidewater Development and Sales Corporation, et al., 183 F. Supp. 402
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
