Elliott J. Roschuni and June Gilbert Roschuni, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 271 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1959)
Annotate this CasePetition for review of decision of the Tax Court of the United States (District of Florida).
Llewellyn A. Luce, Washington, D. C., for petitioners.
Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, John M. Morawski, Sp. Atty., I. R. S., David O. Walter, and Charles B. E. Freeman, Attys., Howard A. Heffron, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, A. F. Prescott, David O. Walter, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The facts from which this controversy arose and the reasons of the Tax Court for its decision are set forth in its opinion. Roschuni v. Commissioner, 29 T.C. 1193. We conclude that the decision of the Tax Court is a correct one and its judgment is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
