United States of America, Appellee, v. Garland Alfonzo Hardy, Appellant, 252 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1958)
Annotate this CaseDecided January 31, 1958
Writ of Certiorari Denied April 28, 1958
See 78 S. Ct. 791.
John T. Moran, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. S. D. N. Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
Garland Alfonzo Hardy, pro se.
Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of Judge Cashin, D.C., 159 F. Supp. 208. As to appellant's claim of ineffective legal representation before sentence in that his counsel refused to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we also point out that a direct appeal does not lie from the denial of such a motion made after indictment. Cogen v. United States, 278 U.S. 221, 49 S. Ct. 118, 73 L. Ed. 275; Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394, 404, 77 S. Ct. 1332, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1442.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
