Warren H. Corning and Maud E. Corning, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.warren H. Corning, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 239 F.2d 646 (6th Cir. 1956)
Annotate this CasePetition to Review Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.
Barring Coughlin and David A. Gaskill, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.
Charles K. Rice, John Potts Barnes, Lee A. Jackson and Loring W. Post, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record and the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, the Court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decision herein reviewed be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of the Tax Court. 24 T.C. 907.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
