Albert A. Arvidson et al., Appellants, v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, Appellee.w. J. Whiteaker et al., Appellants, v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, Appellee, 236 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1956)
Annotate this CaseSchafer, Cronan & Nelson, James P. Cronan, Jr., Portland, Ore., Paul M. Reeder, Hillsboro, Ore., Eisenhower, Hunter, Ramsdell & Duncan, Tacoma, Wash., for appellants.
King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, Frederic A. Yerke, Jr., Portland, Ore., Henderson, Carnahan, Thompson & Gordon, Tacoma, Wash., Walter L. Rice, W. Tobin Lennon, Richmond, Virginia, for appellee.
Before BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges, and MURPHY, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The above cases coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court were not clearly erroneous, and that the judgments are sustained by substantial evidence, and that the conclusions of law of the district court were correctly drawn,
The judgment is affirmed, upon the opinion of the district court in W.D. Wash. 1954, 125 F. Supp. 481.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
