Joseph Fuzia, an Infant by His Guardian Ad Litem Katie Rodenak and Julius Fuzia, Appellants, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellee, 233 F.2d 875 (2d Cir. 1956)
Annotate this CaseDecided May 28, 1956
Samuel Graff, New York City (Samuel Graff, Harry H. Lipsig and Joseph N. Friedman, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Conboy, Hewitt, O'Brien & Boardman, New York City (Joseph P. Allen, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MEDINA, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The order is clearly interlocutory and not appealable. Whether or not the New Jersey two-year Statute of Limitations, Title 48:12-151, New Jersey Revised Statutes, is applicable has not been decided nor has the case been tried on the merits. All that is before us is an order granting defendant leave to file an amended answer.
Appeal dismissed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
