Bernard M. Shotkin, Appellant, v. William A. Black, Dr. Charles A. Rymer, Dr. Clark A. Barnacle, General Electric Company, Henry Tull (henry W. Toll), Appellees.bernard M. Shotkin, Also Known As Barney M. Shotkin, Individually and As Trustee for Bruce Shotkin, Beth Shotkin and Nona Shotkin, Doing Business Under the Trade Name and Styles Edison Power and Light Company and Dison Power and Light Company, Appellant, v. General Electric Company et al., Appellees, 227 F.2d 523 (10th Cir. 1955)
Annotate this CaseRehearing Denied October 10, 1955
Bernard M. Shotkin filed a brief, prose.
Omer Griffin, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Colorado (Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., of Colorado, and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., of Colorado, were with him on the brief), for William A. Black, Dr. Charles A. Rymer and Dr. Clark A. Barnacle.
Grant, Shafroth & Toll, Henry W. Toll, and John F. Shafroth, Denver, Colo., filed a brief for General Electric Company.
Ora H. George, Denver, Colo., filed a brief for Henry Tull.
G. M. Westa, Denver, Colo. (John R. Turnquist and Luis D. Rovira, Denver, Colo., were with him on the brief), for Thomas A. Edison, Inc.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissing appellant's cause of action in the two above-entitled cases for failure to prosecute the same in the trial court. An examination of the record compels the conclusion that the trial court was amply warranted in entering the order appealed from.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
