C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, Doing Business As a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., Appellant, 201 F.2d 512 (3d Cir. 1953)
Annotate this CaseDecided February 6, 1953
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; William Alva Stewart, Judge.
Harry Price, New York City (Stonecipher & Cunningham, by Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney Biron, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a/ Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.
Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opinion of Judge Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., D.C.W.D. Pa. 1952, 103 F. Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for the reasons set out in his opinion.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
