F. H. Harbin and B. E. Harbin, Appellants, v. Richard E. Butler, Appellee, 185 F.2d 238 (6th Cir. 1950)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville; Robert L. Taylor, Judge.
S. F. Dye, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellants.
Green, Webb & McCampbell, Knoxville, Tenn., H. H. McCampbell, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal has been duly heard and considered upon the record and upon the respective oral arguments and briefs of attorneys for the appellant and for the appellee;
And it appearing that the judgment for the plaintiff, now appellee, on the verdict of the jury awarding him $5,000 damages, is supported by substantial evidence and that no error appears in the rulings of the District Court upon the trial.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
