Frances Leon Parrish, Appellant, v. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance Company et al., Appellees, 184 F.2d 185 (9th Cir. 1950)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Ben Harrison, Judge.
Russell H. Pray and Eric A. Rose, Long Beach, Cal., for appellant.
Adams, Duque, Davis & Hazeltine, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Henry Duque, Lawrence T. Lydick and A. Andrew Hauk, all of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant sought judgment in the District Court for the sum of $10,000 as beneficiary under a policy of insurance issued by appellee to her husband. After trial by jury a verdict was rendered in favor of appellant.
On motion of appellee the trial court granted judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict.
In granting the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the court filed a written opinion in which it set out at length and in detail the reasoning upon which it based its judgment.
We think the trial court reached the correct conclusion and we adopt the reasoning expressed in its opinion, D.C., 92 F. Supp. 300.
Judgment affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
