Turnbull et al. v. Cyr et al, 184 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1950)
Annotate this CaseLeonard, Hanna & Brophy, Edmund D. Leonard, Ivan A. Schwab, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Macklin Fleming, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal. (Ward E. Boote, Chief Counsel, Herbert P. Miller, Asst. Chief Counsel, Bureau of Employees' Comp., Fed. Security Agency, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee Cyr.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss a complaint, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Mandate to issue forthwith.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
