National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. the Cooper Company, Inc., Respondent, 179 F.2d 241 (5th Cir. 1950)
Annotate this CasePetition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board sitting at Washington, D. C. (On Motion of the National Labor Relations Board for the Summary Entry of a Decree Upon the Transcript of the Record.)
A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Nat. Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Wm. E. Terrell, Waco, Tex., for respondent.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner's motion is granted. N. L. R. B. v. Hill Bros. Co., 5 Cir., 161 F.2d 179; N. L. R. B. v. Davis, 5 Cir., 172 F.2d 225.
The opinions and orders in N. L. R. B. v. Pool Mfg. Co.1 and N. L. R. B. v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.2 were not intended to be, they were not, departures from the rule of those cases. Indeed, nothing was decided there. The court, expressly deferring decision, merely referred the matter back to the Board for its assistance in furnishing further information and for its recommendations or requests in the light of such further information.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
