Hudson v. Larson
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HOMER HUDSON,1 Respondent Below, Appellant, v. DASIA LARSON, Petitioner Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 229, 2021 Court Below–Family Court of the State of Delaware File No. CN20-01794 Petition No. 20-25038 Submitted: August 10, 2021 Decided: August 31, 2021 ORDER On July 20, 2021, Homer Hudson filed an appeal from the Family Court’s June 22, 2021 interim custody order. On July 22, 2021, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified mail, to Hudson to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an apparent interlocutory order. Hudson received the notice to show cause, as evidenced by the return receipt filed with the Court on July 29, 2021. A timely response to the notice to show cause was due on or before August 9, 2021.2 To date, 1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d). Because the tenth day fell on a Sunday—August 8, 2021—Hudson had until the end of the next business day to file a response to the notice to show cause. Del. Supr. Ct. R. 11(a). 2 Hudson has not responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of the appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
