Benson v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EDWARD W. BENSON, III, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 85, 2020 Court Below–Superior Court of the State of Delaware Cr. ID No. 1811007923 (N) Submitted: March 25, 2020 Decided: April 1, 2020 Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices. ORDER Upon consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that: (1) On February 27, 2020, the appellant, Edward Benson, III, filed a notice of appeal from a January 24, 2020 Superior Court bench ruling, denying his motion to suppress. The Clerk issued a notice directing Benson to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed because this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a criminal interlocutory appeal. (2) Benson filed a response to the notice to show cause on March 25, 2020. Benson argues that the Court should consider his interlocutory appeal because— among other reasons—the Superior Court erred in its statutory interpretation of Delaware law and its ruling was in conflict with Delaware legal precedent. (3) This Court lacks jurisdiction to review interlocutory rulings of the Superior Court in a pending criminal case prior to the entry of a final order.1 This well-settled principle of Delaware constitutional law precludes our consideration of Benson’s appeal. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice 1 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b); Rash v. State, 318 A.2d 603 (Del. 1974). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
