Lloyd v. Jeffers
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHRISTY LLOYD,1 Respondent Below, Appellant, v. KASEY JEFFERS, Petitioner Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 39, 2019 Court Below: Family Court of the State of Delaware File No. CN16-03944 Petition No. 18-29145 Submitted: March 28, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2019 ORDER The appellant filed a notice of appeal on January 25, 2019. Instead of paying the filing fee, she submitted with her notice of appeal a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, but the motion did not contain all the required information. On January 28, 2019, the Senior Court Clerk sent the appellant a letter enclosing the incomplete motion and directing her to return the completed motion no later than February 12, 2019, or a notice to show cause would issue. On February 19, 2019, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed because of her failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by filing 1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). the completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The appellant failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
