Amur Finance Company, Inc. v. Pine River Master Fund Ltd.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AMUR FINANCE COMPANY, INC. and AMUR FINANCE IV LLC, Defendants-Below, Appellants, v. PINE RIVER MASTER FUND LTD. and PINE RIVER FIXED INCOME MASTER FUND LTD., Plaintiffs-Below, Appellees. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 7, 2018 Court Below—Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware No. 2017-0145-JRS Submitted: June 13, 2018 Decided: July 9, 2018 Before VALIHURA, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. ORDER This 9th day of July 2018, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs, oral argument, and the record on appeal, it appears that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its October 12, 2017 Memorandum Opinion.1 1 Justice Traynor concurs in the judgment, but on a different reading of the Credit Agreement than the Court of Chancery’s. In his view, Amur Finance IV’s periodic transfers to Amur Finance Company of dividends it received on shares of a third-party company that Amur Finance Company had given it to hold—purportedly pursuant to an agreement the two companies negotiated prior to the Credit Agreement—were not, as the Court of Chancery said, prohibited “distributions in respect of [Amur Finance IV’s] equity interests” within the meaning of § 5.07(d) of the Credit Agreement or prohibited “transactions” with an affiliate within the meaning of § 5.07(f), but rather were prohibited “payments” to an affiliate under § 5.07(f). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery be AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
