Rivkin v. Choupak, et al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VLADIMIR RIVKIN, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, v. MICHAEL CHOUPAK, SERGUEI SOFINSKI, and INTERMEDIA.NET, INC., Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants-Below, Appellees. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 292, 2015 Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware C.A. No. 7000-VCL Submitted: December 2, 2015 Decided: December 4, 2014 Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND, VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc. ORDER This 4th day of December 2015, having considered this matter on the briefs filed by the parties, the Court has concluded that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed for the reasons stated in its March 21, 2013 bench ruling,1 its April 6, 2015 memorandum opinion,2 and its May 12, 2015 Order Addressing Award of Fees and Costs.3 1 Choupak v. Rivkin, C.A. No. 7000 (Del. Ch. Mar. 21, 2013). Choupak v. Rivkin, 2015 WL 1589610 (Del. Ch. Apr. 6, 2015). 3 Choupak v. Rivkin, 2015 WL 2233996 (Del. Ch. May 12, 2015). 2 NOW, THERFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED and the Appellees’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees on Appeal is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.