Weidman v. Rantz
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SUSAN PITTARD WEIDMAN, Defendant BelowAppellant, v. GARY F. RANTZ, Plaintiff BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 216, 2012 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. N11C-06-043 Submitted: May 15, 2012 Decided: May 23, 2012 Before BERGER, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 23rd day of May 2012, it appears to the Court that: (1) Defendant, Susan Weidman, has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an appeal from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court dated April 17, 2012. The trial court s order denied Weidman s motion for judgment on the pleadings and/or summary judgment. (2) Weidman filed her application for certification to take an interlocutory appeal in the Superior Court on April 20, 2012. The Superior Court denied the certification application on May 14, 2012. (3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court. In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within interlocutory appeal be REFUSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jack B. Jacobs Justice -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
