Grayson v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WILLIS L. GRAYSON, JR., Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 57, 2011 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County Cr. ID No. 30500267DI Submitted: June 1, 2011 Decided: August 18, 2011 Before BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 18th day of August 2011, upon consideration of the appellant s opening brief and the appellee s motion to affirm, it appears to the Court that:1 (1) The appellant filed this appeal from the Superior Court s January 18, 2011 denial of his fourth motion for postconviction relief. It is manifest on the face of the appellant s opening brief that the Superior Court s judgment should be affirmed on the basis of the court s well- 1 See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 25(a) (governing motion to affirm). reasoned decision dated January 18, 2011.2 The Superior Court did not err when determining that the appellant s fourth motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred, and that the appellant offered no reason to excuse the procedural defaults. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee s motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jack B. Jacobs Justice 2 See State v. Grayson, 2011 WL 285599 (Del. Super.) (denying fourth motion for postconviction relief). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
