Stanley v. Thompson

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TAMMY STANLEY,1 Petitioner BelowAppellant, v. JAMES THOMPSON, Respondent BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 287, 2011 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County File No. CS08-02909 Submitted: August 4, 2011 Decided: August 18, 2011 ORDER This 18th day of August 2011, it appears to the Court that, on July 13, 2011, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not paying the Family Court and Supreme Court filing fees and the Family Court transcript costs. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period. Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 1 The Court sua sponte assigned pseudonyms to the parties by Order dated June 13, 2011. Supr. Ct. R. 7(d). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Myron T. Steele Chief Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.