Hubbard v. State
Annotate this CaseDefendant-Appellant Hubbard appeals the lower court’s denial of his motion to suppress his custodial statement, arguing that his waiver of Miranda rights was not knowing, intelligent or voluntary. Defendant was convicted on twelve offenses, including attempted murder, carjacking, conspiracy and possession of a deadly weapon. He was sentenced to twelve life terms. Defendant argues that he was not able to “fully comprehend the nature of his Miranda rights and the consequences of abandoning those rights” because he was “drunk and high.” On review of the interrogation transcript, the Court held that Defendant made an express waiver of his Miranda rights by his words and actions, and that Defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.