Vicks v. Mixon

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RENEE VICKS, Respondent BelowAppellant, v. BRANDON MIXON, Petitioner BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 484, 2010 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for Kent County File No. CN07-04842 Petition No. 08-21358 Submitted: September 13, 2010 Decided: September 21, 2010 ORDER This 21st day of September 2010, it appears to the Court that, on August 24, 2010, the Clerk of the Court issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not paying the Family Court filing fee. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period. Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/Henry duPont Ridgely Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.