Foster v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN E. FOSTER, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 661, 2009 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County Cr. ID No. 0703031898 Submitted: November 24, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 4th day of December 2009, upon consideration of the appellant s response to the notice to show cause, the appellee s answer to the appellant s response to the notice to show cause, and the appellant s motion for appointment of counsel, it appears to the Court that: (1) On November 10, 2009, the appellant, John E. Foster, filed a notice of appeal from a Superior Court commissioner s October 1, 2009 report recommending that Foster s motion for postconviction relief should be denied. Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the Clerk issued a notice directing that Foster show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for this Court s lack of jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a commissioner s report and recommendation.1 (2) In his response (and numerous supplemental responses) to the notice to show cause, Foster maintains that the Court should entertain his appeal. Foster does not, however, address the jurisdictional issue raised in the notice to show cause. (3) The Court s appellate jurisdiction is limited to decisions issued by judges of a court.2 The Court does not have the authority to hear an appeal directly from a report and recommendation of a Superior Court commissioner without intermediate review by a Superior Court judge.3 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. The motion for appointment of counsel is MOOT. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice 1 Johnson v. State, 884 A.2d 475, 479 (Del. 2005). Id. 3 Id. See also Cleveland v. State, 2009 WL 1579000 (Del. Supr.) (dismissing appeal from commissioner s order as an impermissible interlocutory appeal in a criminal case ); Wilmer v. State, 2009 WL 696400 (Del. Supr.) (dismissing appeal from commissioner s report recommending that appellant s motion for postconviction relief should be denied). In this case, it appears that Foster filed objections to the commissioner s report and recommendation, and that those objections are pending before a Superior Court judge. 2 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
