Cramer v. Brady

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DONALD CRAMER, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. CAROLYN BRADY, Respondent Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 232, 2009 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County File No. CN09-01824 Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009 ORDER This 4th day of December 2009, it appears to the Court that, on November 17, the Clerk sent a notice to appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for appellant's failure to diligently prosecute his appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix in this matter. Appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required tenday period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/Henry duPont Ridgely Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.