Huntley et al. v. B & R 1105, LLC
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE § § § § § § § § § § § § § DONALD W. HUNTLEY and HUNTLEY & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendants BelowAppellants, v. B & R 1105, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff BelowAppellee. No. 296, 2009 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 07C-05-207 Submitted: September 4, 2009 Decided: September 10, 2009 ORDER This 10th day of September 2009, it appears to the Court that, on August 25, 2009, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellants failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not filing the opening brief and appendix in this matter. The appellants have failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period. Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.1 1 Appellant Huntley is a Delaware lawyer. Huntley was sent delinquency letters on July 21, 2009, August 5, 2009, and August 13, 2009. A notice to show cause for performance deficiency also was issued on August 13, 2009. On August 14, 2009, the Court granted Huntley s out-of-time motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief. In its 1 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice Order, the Court stated that, if the opening brief were not filed in a timely manner, a notice to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed would be issued. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
