Hall v. DSCF

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AMY HALL, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND THEIR FAMILIES, DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 134, 2007 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Kent County C.A. No. 06-072TK ORDER This 14th day of June 2007, it appears to the Court that, on May 14, 2007, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to diligently prosecute her appeal by not paying to the Family Court the record preparation fee and transcript costs. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/Henry duPont Ridgely Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.