Udo v. Umoren-Udo

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VICTOR E. UDO, Petitioner BelowAppellant, v. FAITH V. UMOREN-UDO, Respondent BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 401, 2006 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County File No. CN06-01200 Petition No. 06-00951 Submitted: September 21, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices ORDER This third day of October 2006, the Court has considered the appellee s motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) and finds it manifest on the face of the appellant s opening brief that the appeal is without merit for the reasons stated by the Family Court in its decision dated June 29, 2006. We conclude that there was no error or abuse of discretion on the part of the Family Court in affirming the commissioner s February 3, 2006 order. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee s motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.