Sahagen, et al. v. Castiel, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PETER D. SAHAGEN and SAHAGEN SATELLITE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC Counterclaim Defendants and Reply Counterlcaim Plaintiffs Below, Appellants/Cross Appellees, v. DAVID J. CASTIEL, ELLIPSO, INC., VIRTUAL GEOSATELLITE HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant-Counterlcaim Plaintiffs Below, Appellee/Cross Appellants, and MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. Reply Counterclaim Defendant Below, Appellee/Cross Appellant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 268, 2004 Court Below: Chancery Court in and for New Castle County No. 17995 Submitted: December 1, 2004 Decided: December 14, 2004 Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 14th day of December, 2004, the Court, having considered this matter at oral argument and on the briefs of the parties, concludes that the matter should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its decisions dated March 10, 2003 and June 1, 2004.1 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgments of the Court of Chancery be AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/Henry duPont Ridgely Justice 1 The Court of Chancery dismissed the counterclaims for damages with prejudice for the reasons stated in a pretrial conference on December 10, 2003.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
