Epperson v. State

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEVIN S. EPPERSON, Defendant BelowAppellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 278, 2004 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County Cr.A. Nos. IN94-08-1484 and 1485 Cr. ID No. 9408009291 Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: September 17, 2004 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and JACOBS, Justices. ORDER This 17th day of September 2004, after careful consideration of the appellant s opening brief, the State s motion to affirm, and the record below, we find it manifest that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated June 22, 2004. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that Epperson s self-titled Motion Pursuant to Rule 35(a) for the Correction of an Illegal Sentence, in fact, was more akin to a motion for postconviction relief under Superior Court Rule 61 because it challenged the validity of his convictions.* The Superior Court did not err in * See Brittingham v. State, 705 A.2d 577, 578 (Del. 1998) (holding that allegations of error occurring before imposition of sentence are inappropriate under Rule 35(a) because a holding that Epperson s motion, whether analyzed as a motion for postconviction relief or as a motion for correction of sentence, was without merit. The motion was both time-barred and formerly adjudicated under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(i)(1), (4), and Epperson failed to overcome these procedural hurdles. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Myron T. Steele Chief Justice proceeding under Rule 35(a) presupposes a valid conviction). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.