Jacobson v. Dryson Acceptance Corp et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GREG JACOBSON, § § Plaintiff-Counterclaim § Defendant Below, § Appellant/Cross-Appellee,§ § v. § § DRYSON ACCEPTANCE CORP. § and MICHAEL DRY, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees/Cross§ Appellants. § Submitted: Decided: No. 669, 2002 Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and New Castle County C. A. No. 17684 May 20, 2003 June 13, 2003 Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices. ORDER This 13th day of June 2003, the Court has determined as follows: to the extent that (a) the issues raised on appeal and cross-appeal are factual, the record evidence supports the trial judge s factual findings; (b) the errors alleged on appeal and crossappeal are asserted to constitute an abuse of discretion, the record does not support those assertions; and (c) the issues raised on appeal and cross-appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware law, which was properly applied. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED on the basis of, and for the reasons set forth, in the decision of the Court of Chancery dated November 1, 2002. BY THE COURT: /s/ E. Norman Veasey Chief Justice -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
