Ingman v. Ingman

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JON INGMAN, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. PAMELA INGMAN, Petitioner Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 421, 2003 Court Below: Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County File No. CN02-09636 Petition No. 02-28497 ORDER This 27th day of October 2003, it appears to the Court that, on September 30, 2003, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not paying the Family Court and Supreme Court appeal fees. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ E. Norman Veasey Chief Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.