Flowers v. Laidlaw Corporation

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KENNETH M. FLOWERS, § § Claimant/Appellant Below§ Appellant, § § v. § § LAIDLAW CORPORATION, § § Employer/Appellee Below§ Appellee, § § and § § UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE § APPEALS BOARD, § § Appellee Below§ Appellee. § No. 612, 2001 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 00A-11-002 ORDER This 25th day of March 2002, it appears to the Court that: (1) Appellant Kenneth M. Flowers filed a pro se notice of appeal with this Court on December 3, 2001. Flowers has failed to file his opening brief.1 (2) On February 8, 2002, the Clerk issued a notice pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) directing Flowers to show cause why the appeal 1 SUPR. CT. R. 15(a) (i). should not be dismissed for his failure to pursue the appeal diligently by filing an opening brief and appendix. Because Flowers has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: s/Joseph T. Walsh Justice 2 SUPR. CT. R. 3(b) (2). -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.