Monk et al. v. Imaging Automation, Inc

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRUCE C. MONK and HOWARD DENTON, Petitioners BelowAppellants, v. IMAGING AUTOMATION, INC., Respondent BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 229, 2002 Court Below-Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 19290 Submitted: August 9, 2002 Decided: August 29, 2002 Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH and HOLLAND, Justices ORDER This 29th day of August 2002, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, it appears to the Court that the March 26, 2002 judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in the Court of Chancery s ruling from the bench dated March 21, 2002. This matter is clearly controlled by this Court s decision in Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co., 24 A.2d 315 (Del. 1942). See also Orban v. Field, 1993 WL 547187 (Del. Ch.). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: s/Joseph T. Walsh Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.