Miller v. Miller

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DANIEL S. MILLER, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. KATHY E. MILLER, Respondent Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 285, 2000 Court Below: Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County File No. CN88-6714 Submitted: March 27, 2001 Decided: March 28, 2001 Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and STEELE, Justices. ORDER This 28th day of March 2001, the Court, having carefully considered the decision and judgment of the Family Court dated May 15, 2000, together with the briefs filed by the parties, has determined as follows: To the extent that: (a) the issues raised on appeal are factual, the record evidence supports the trial judge s factual findings; (b) the errors alleged on appeal are attributed to an abuse of discretion, the record does not support those assertions; (c) the issues raised on appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware law, which was properly applied. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: (A) Appellant's request for oral argument is DENIED; and (B) The judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ E. Norman Veasey Chief Justice -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.