Midland Food Services et al. v. Castle Hill Holdings et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MIDLAND FOOD SERVICES, LLC, MIDLAND FOOD SERVICES II, LLC, AND MIDLAND FOOD SERVICES III, LLC, § § § § § Plaintiffs Below, § Appellants, § § v. § § CASTLE HILL HOLDINGS V, LL, § CASTLE HILL HOLDINGS VI, LLC, § CASTLE HILL HOLDINGS VII, LLC § RONALD F. SAVERIN, JANET M. § SAVERIN, MAJESS, LLC, and DAJUST, § LLC, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. § No. 509, 1999 Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 16779-NC Submitted: June 13, 2001 Decided: June 15, 2001 Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, HOLLAND, BERGER and STEELE, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc. ORDER This 15th day of June 2001, upon consideration of the briefs, supplemental memoranda and the oral argument held on June 13, 2001, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in its well-reasoned Opinion dated August 12, 1999. To the extent that appellants had claimed on appeal that the Vice Chancellor improperly considered matters outside the pleadings on a motion to dismiss under Chancery Rule 12(b)(6), we find that appellants expressly acquiesced in the consideration of the questioned matters and abandoned their initial contention that these matters could not be considered on a motion to dismiss. See Opinion at 10 n.5. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ E. Norman Veasey Chief Justice -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
