Derdiger v. Tallman
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HOWARD DERDIGER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, § § § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § § v. § § JOSEPH P. TALLMAN, JOHN R. § DURANT, M.D., KINNEY L. § JOHNSON, RICHARD C. MILLER, § FRANK G. WASHINGTON and § HBO & COMPANY, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. § No. 395, 2000 Submitted: August 15, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000 ORDER Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH and HOLLAND, Justices. This 29th day of August 2000, it appears to the Court that: (1) The plaintiff-appellant, Howard Derdiger, has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to appeal from the Court of Chancery s July 20, 2000 interlocutory Memorandum Opinion and Order granting the defendant-appellees motion to stay. (2) On August 14, 2000, the Court of Chancery refused to certify an interlocutory appeal to this Court pursuant to Rule 42. (3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court and are granted only in exceptional circumstances.* We have examined the Court of Chancery s July 20, 2000 decision according to the criteria set forth in Rule 42. We agree with the Court of Chancery s analysis of August 14, 2000 in refusing to certify this interlocutory appeal. In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that exceptional circumstances do not exist in this case to merit interlocutory review of the decision of the Court of Chancery. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the within interlocutory appeal be, and the same hereby is, REFUSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice * Supr. Ct. R. 42(b).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
