The Dow Chemical Company, et al. v. Organik Kimya Holdings, A.S., et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SAM GLASSCOCK III VICE CHANCELLOR COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Date Submitted: March 9, 2018 Date Decided: March 16, 2018 Rodger D. Smith II, Esquire Ryan D. Stottmann, Esquire Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Kathleen Furey McDonough, Esquire John A. Sensing, Esquire Ryan C. Cicoski, Esquire Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP Hercules Plaza, Sixth Floor 1313 North Market Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Re: The Dow Chemical Company et al. v. Organik Kimya Holdings, A.S. et al., Civil Action No. 12090-VCG Dear Counsel: For the reasons stated at the conclusion of oral argument on March 9, 2018, the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery is granted and the discovery stay is lifted. To the extent the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO ORDERED. Sincerely, /s/ Sam Glasscock III Sam Glasscock III
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
