IMO the Estate of Lula I. Smith
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN W. NOBLE VICE CHANCELLOR 417 SOUTH STATE STREET DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 TELEPHONE: (302) 739-4397 FACSIMILE: (302) 739-6179 April 9, 2012 Via LexisNexis File & Serve and First Class Mail John S. Grady, Esquire Grady & Hampton LLC 6 North Bradford Street Dover, DE 19904 Re: Mr. Harold W. Smith, Jr. 10538 Waller Road Laurel, DE 19956 IMO the Estate of Lula I. Smith C.A. No. 6628-VCN Date Submitted: March 1, 2012 Dear Mr. Smith and Mr. Grady: On February 17, 2012, following a hearing that Mr. Smith did not attend, I entered an order authorizing the private sale of Estate property with an address of 10538 Waller Road, Laurel, Delaware. The Property was the principal asset of the Estate of Lula I. Smith and was devised to Mr. Smith. The purpose of the sale was to pay the debts of the Estate. IMO the Estate of Lula I. Smith C.A. No. 6628-VCN April 9, 2012 Page 2 Later, Mr. Smith requested that the Court reconsider its decision. The on March 1, 2012.1 It appears that Mr. Smith has made arrangements with Sussex County for the payment of the major debt of the Estate, a tax bill of approximately $21,000. He has agreed to pay $500 per month, which would result in the satisfaction of that tax lien in something just short of four years. Other debts include medical expenses, payments due to siblings because of their payment of services. Mr. Smith has indicated that he could pay $200 per month toward these other debts. Because the Property was devised to Mr. Smith and because it appears to be worth significantly more than all of the debts of the Estate, it seems appropriate that he be given a chance to protect or salvage his inheritance and that it not be sold immediately to pay the debts of the Estate. 1 Shortly after the hearing, counsel for the Petitioner reported to the Court that the parties were negotiating a resolution of this matter. Accordingly, the Court deferred decision pending the efforts to reach resolution. On April 5, 2012, counsel for the Petitioner informed the Court that the negotiations had been unsuccessful. IMO the Estate of Lula I. Smith C.A. No. 6628-VCN April 9, 2012 Page 3 , authorizing the private sale of the Property is vacated. Mr. Smith shall pay $200 per month, beginning April 20, 2012, to Mr. Grady as attorney for the Estate, and those payments shall be applied in a fair and equitable manner toward the debts of the Estate, with priority being given to debts of those not members of the family. Nothing in this Letter Opinion and Order shall compromise the rights of third-party creditors and, if third-party creditors insist upon payment, the sale of the Property may be necessary. If Mr. Smith does not meet the payment obligation set forth in this Letter Opinion or to Sussex County for payment of the taxes due it, the order for sale may be reauthorized, on application. In the interim, Mr. Smith shall not subject the Property to any other liens or encumbrances, without Court approval. Similarly, Mr. Smith is hereby precluded from selling the Property, pending further order of the Court. Among the debts of the Estate to be paid by Mr. Smith is the fee due Mr. Grady, together with his reasonable expenses. Mr. Grady shall provide a statement for his services to Mr. Smith within thirty (30) days of the date of this Letter Opinion. It is acknowledged that additional fees may be incurred by Mr. Grady IMO the Estate of Lula I. Smith C.A. No. 6628-VCN April 9, 2012 Page 4 on. If, at any time, Mr. Smith does not wish to comply with the terms of this Letter Opinion and Order, he shall notify the Court and Mr. Grady and the authorization for a private sale will be reinstituted. The Court retains jurisdiction and it is expressly provided that the sale, as previously ordered, may become necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Very truly yours, /s/ John W. Noble JWN/cap cc: Ms. Patricia E. Dise Mr. Robert J. Smith Mr. John W. Smith Ms. Dorothy S. Wyatt Mr. Donald L. Smith Register in Chancery-K
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
